veiled4allah veiled4allah: connecting the dots on Iraq

Al-Muhajabah's Islamic Blogs Home
« double standards? | veiled4allah archives | Iraq: squaring the circle »
Trackbacks (2 in, 1 out) | 

Email this link | Print this entry | RDF

Further Reading | Elsewhere | Search Options
Add this entry to your hotlist (View your hotlist)

connecting the dots on Iraq

Date: June 25, 2005 | 18 Jumada al-Awwal 1426 Hijriah
Subjects: britain, iraq, deception, war
It's Sunday (well, not in this time zone, but in the UK), so it must be time for the latest weekly installment from Michael Smith of London's Sunday Times.

Sure enough, here it is.

During the week, Smith published an article in the Los Angeles Times revealing a bit more about how he got all the leaked memos and setting out what he thinks is the real story, the bombing campaign.

Smith published another version of this article in the Sunday Times adding some information and commentary that didn't appear in the LA Times. On the second page of this article, he mentions:

Last week one US blogger, Larisa Alexandrovna of RawStory.com, unearthed more unsettling evidence. It was an overlooked interview with Lieutenant-General T Michael Moseley, the allied air commander in Iraq, in which he appears to admit that the "spikes of activity" were part of a covert air war. From June 2002 until March 20, when the ground war began, the allies flew 21,736 sorties over southern Iraq, attacking 349 carefully selected targets. The attacks, Moseley said, "laid the foundations" for the invasion, allowing allied commanders to begin the ground war.

The bloggers may have found their own smoking gun.
Smith has followed up with his own article about this:

The American general who commanded allied air forces during the Iraq war appears to have admitted in a briefing to American and British officers that coalition aircraft waged a secret air war against Iraq from the middle of 2002, nine months before the invasion began. Addressing a briefing on lessons learnt from the Iraq war Lieutenant-General Michael Moseley said that in 2002 and early 2003 allied aircraft flew 21,736 sorties, dropping more than 600 bombs on 391 "carefully selected targets" before the war officially started.

The nine months of allied raids "laid the foundations" for the allied victory, Moseley said. They ensured that allied forces did not have to start the war with a protracted bombardment of Iraqi positions.

If those raids exceeded the need to maintain security in the no-fly zones of southern and northern Iraq, they would leave President George W Bush and Tony Blair vulnerable to allegations that they had acted illegally.

Moseley's remarks have emerged after reports in The Sunday Times that showed an increase in allied bombing in southern Iraq was described in leaked minutes of a meeting of the war cabinet as "spikes of activity to put pressure on the regime".

Moseley told the briefing at Nellis airbase in Nebraska on July 17, 2003, that the raids took place under cover of patrols of the southern no-fly zone; their purpose was ostensibly to protect the ethnic minorities.

A leaked memo previously disclosed by The Sunday Times, detailing a meeting chaired by the prime minister and attended by Jack Straw, the foreign secretary, Geoff Hoon, the then defence secretary, and Admiral Sir Michael Boyce, chief of defence staff, indicated that the US was carrying out the bombing.

But Moseley's remarks, and figures for the amount of bombs dropped in southern Iraq during 2002, indicate that the RAF was taking as large a part in the bombing as American aircraft.

Details of the Moseley briefing come amid rising concern in the US at the war. A new poll shows 60% of Americans now believe it was a mistake.
This really is old news (see also here) and Raw Story isn't the only site to pick up on it, if Raw Story got it into the Sunday Times, they deserve some credit.

Try Googling "operation southern focus" and don't forget to go here.
~ Posted by Al-Muhajabah, a member of the reality-based community, at 09:24 PM

Trackbacks

What is trackback?
You Pinged Me

Here's who's pinging me:

RSS feed of trackbacks to this entry

I Pinged You

My own entry was in reference to one or more posts elsewhere. If you'd like to add a link to your post there, add the following to the list of URLs that you ping:

Take a quick peek at the post(s) I pinged:


  • ...
Note: The links in the "You pinged me" section are generated automatically as a way of showing who is linking to me. Display of these links does not constitute endorsement of the content of those sites.


Further reading

Recent entries

The following is a list of the ten most recent entries in veiled4allah as of Mar 15, 2006:

View a list of all entries in veiled4allah

Related entries

This entry has been tagged as covering the following subjects: britain iraq deception war. The following is a list of the ten most recent entries in Al-Muhajabah's Islamic Blogs that share any of these tags:

A semantic analysis of this entry also suggests the following keywords to search for related content on: sunday times, southern iraq, flew sorties, laid foundations, smith published, war, Iraq, iraq, moseley, allied, Moseley, times, Times, southern, Sunday, sunday, bombing, smith, briefing, michael, Smith, Michael, article, air, story

What links here: View a list of other entries in this blog (if any) that link to this entry

Or look generally for informational pages on my website tagged with britain, iraq, deception, war

Results of Semantic Search

A semantic search of Al-Muhajabah's Islamic Blogs suggests the following as the ten entries most closely related to this entry:



Elsewhere

External resources

Check out other web pages (if any) that I've bookmarked via del.icio.us that share the same tags: britain, iraq, deception, war

Explore reference materials from Answers.com about these subjects: britain, iraq, deception, war

Read news stories at Common Times about these subjects: britain, iraq, deception, war

View search results at gada.be metasearch service for these subjects: britain, iraq, deception, war

Find books at Amazon.com on these subjects: britain, iraq, deception, war

Other views

Check Waypath for blog entries generally related to this entry, or Technorati or Bloglines for blog entries that link to this entry.

Technorati tags: View blog entries, bookmarks and photos tagged by others with the same subjects as this entry:



Search options

     

For external resources on the topic of this entry, you can run a search for its title connecting the dots on iraq (Google, DayPop, Feedster) or keyword(s) britain iraq deception war (Google, DayPop, Feedster). DayPop is a search engine similar to Google that focuses on searching news sources and blogs. Feedster searches blogs via RSS feeds.