All comments are copyright their authors
Here's who's pinging me:
The following is a list of the ten most recent entries in veiled4allah as of Mar 02, 2006:
View a list of all entries in veiled4allah
This entry has been tagged as covering the following subjects: fiqh. The following is a list of the ten most recent entries in Al-Muhajabah's Islamic Blogs that share any of these tags:
A semantic analysis of this entry also suggests the following keywords to search for related content on: islamic law, right take, life interests, oppose death, persons life, law, life, islamic, Islamic, fetus, abortion, being, human, right, take, issue, own, same, choice, society, oppose, concious, discuss, god, living
What links here: View a list of other entries in this blog (if any) that link to this entry
Or look generally for informational pages on my website tagged with fiqh
A semantic search of Al-Muhajabah's Islamic Blogs suggests the following as the ten entries most closely related to this entry:
Check out other web pages (if any) that I've bookmarked via del.icio.us that share the same tags: fiqh
Explore reference materials from Answers.com about these subjects: fiqh
Read news stories at Common Times about these subjects: fiqh
View search results at gada.be metasearch service for these subjects: fiqh
Find books at Amazon.com on these subjects: fiqh
Check Waypath for blog entries generally related to this entry, or Technorati or Bloglines for blog entries that link to this entry.
Technorati tags: View blog entries, bookmarks and photos tagged by others with the same subjects as this entry: fiqh
For external resources on the topic of this entry, you can run a search for its title abortion in islamic law (Google, DayPop, Feedster) or keyword(s) fiqh (Google, DayPop, Feedster). DayPop is a search engine similar to Google that focuses on searching news sources and blogs. Feedster searches blogs via RSS feeds.
It is interesting that "pro-choice" campaigners, in my experience, happen to the very same people who oppose war (on Iraq in this instane) and oppose the death penalty. The right to take a persons life, in the interests of serving justice on one who has flouted not only the law of land, but his own moral concious - when ordinary folk do not feel the same urge to do so - is defended to the hilt by campaigners who oppose the death penalty. Yet, the rights of the unborn, who has not even been able to breath the free air, are taken in the guise of "choice" and "lifestyle". Such corrosive ethics are sure to sap away the already dying edifice of morality.
Further, and this is meant to be taken as a severe rebuke, rather than an insult (I hope!), the "freedom" to kill your unborn child is simply the logical progression of the consumerist and purposless drive of secular society, whre child-bearing and rearing is becoming like any other "accessory", and "choice" is all important.
In fact, raising children is not only as an individual responsiblity, but also a social responsiblity - for families form a network which makes society. The philosophical cognet of Islamic law is based around this - protecting the family, which protects society. That is why a society driven by individualsim cannot understand the spirit behind Islamic law (that, and the legalism which our Jurists are marked by, who too seemed to forget the spirit of the Law).
Liberalism was meant to invigorate the "magesterium", and to free it from the clutches of self-appointed divines, who had stagnated and blocked freedom of human thought. But it ended up destroying it. This is culminating in the lowering of aesthetics and morality. Sad to say, most Muslim countries, at least their secular elite, want to follow this path.
I just realised a mistake:
"The right to take a persons life, in the interests of serving justice on one who has flouted not only the law of land, but his own moral concious - when ordinary folk do not feel the same urge to do so - is defended to the hilt by campaigners who oppose the death penalty"
should in fact read:
"The right to take a persons life, in the interests of serving justice on one who has flouted not only the law of land, but his own moral concious - when ordinary folk do not feel the same urge to do so - is opposed to the hilt by people who support the right to take the unborns life."
My apologies.
Salaam