All comments are copyright their authors
Here's who's pinging me:
The following is a list of the ten most recent entries in veiled4allah as of Mar 02, 2006:
View a list of all entries in veiled4allah
This entry has been tagged as covering the following subjects: antiwar. The following is a list of the ten most recent entries in Al-Muhajabah's Islamic Blogs that share any of these tags:
A semantic analysis of this entry also suggests the following keywords to search for related content on: war crime, gassing kurds, world attention, attention away, article gassing, war, crime, see, god, people, Iran, God, gassing, iran, world, Iraq, iraq, kurds, Kurds, seem, really, intelligence, away, attention, kurdish
What links here: View a list of other entries in this blog (if any) that link to this entry
Or look generally for informational pages on my website tagged with antiwar
A semantic search of Al-Muhajabah's Islamic Blogs suggests the following as the ten entries most closely related to this entry:
Check out other web pages (if any) that I've bookmarked via del.icio.us that share the same tags: antiwar
Explore reference materials from Answers.com about these subjects: antiwar
Read news stories at Common Times about these subjects: antiwar
View search results at gada.be metasearch service for these subjects: antiwar
Find books at Amazon.com on these subjects: antiwar
Check Waypath for blog entries generally related to this entry, or Technorati or Bloglines for blog entries that link to this entry.
Technorati tags: View blog entries, bookmarks and photos tagged by others with the same subjects as this entry: antiwar
For external resources on the topic of this entry, you can run a search for its title reality check (Google, DayPop, Feedster) or keyword(s) antiwar (Google, DayPop, Feedster). DayPop is a search engine similar to Google that focuses on searching news sources and blogs. Feedster searches blogs via RSS feeds.
And Allah knows best.
ssm th pctr ws f "tstd" rq sldrs. wndr f ny f thm wr nvlvd n gssng 10,000 Krdsh vllgrs. thght th pctr shwng vllg f Krdsh mn, wmn nd chldrn lyng dd n th strts f thr vllg, bltd, hvng sffrd hrrbl dth frm psn gs, md ths n lk tm by cmprsn.
By th wy, th Krdsh cvlns ddn't hv th chnc t fght bck.
Jst lttl fd fr thght.
Kn
I'd also appreciate it if you would read the following article about the gassing of the Kurds: America didn't seem to mind poison gas. The gassing you refer to occurred in 1987 and 1988 while Saddam Hussein was still a client of the United States and the United States was arming him with weapons, including chemical and biological weapons, to use against Iran. The U.S. also helped direct world attention away from what had happened.
The reason I mention this is not to excuse this crime against humanity - dear God, no - but to provide some context that you, as usual, seem to be unaware of.
I also notice that once again you seem to ascribe to a policy of "it's OK to respond to a war crime with a war crime". We don't just massacre some whole group of people because some of them committed a crime. We investigate, find out which ones are guilty, put them on trial, and punish them. Anything else kills the innocent along with the guilty. Is that really what you're endorsing here?
This leaves open a lot of questions. Assuming that U.S. intelligence has proved that Iran did it (as the author claims), why in the world is Bush claiming that Iraq did it and using this as a justification for making war on Iraq? The moral depravity of such an action is shocking. On the other hand, maybe Bush knows that the intelligence report is not correct, in which case U.S. intelligence has made up a horrific lie against Iran in order to direct world attention away from what Iraq did when it was our client. This is what the first article alleges.
No matter how you look at it, either Iran or Iraq is being slandered with accusations of genocide for political gain. God, that is sick.