The Clipboard The Clipboard: Negligence in Afghanistan

Al-Muhajabah's Islamic Blogs Home
« Why the CEO in Chief Needs an Audit | The Clipboard archives | 'Only Muslims can be terrorists?' »
Comments (0) | Trackbacks (1 in, 0 out) | 

Email this link | Print this article | RDF

Further Reading | Elsewhere | Search Options
Add this entry to your hotlist (View your hotlist)

Negligence in Afghanistan

Date: July 10, 2003 | 10 Jumada al-Awwal 1424 Hijriah
Subjects: afghanistan

From an article1:

Today, partly as a consequence of the administration's doctrinal enmity toward foreign policy as social welfare, warlords are in the saddle again in many Afghan provinces. Poppy production and the heroin trade are flourishing. Roads and irrigation works are yet to be rebuilt. Worst of all, neither the American soldiers hunting Al Qaeda nor the International Security Assistance Force in the country have provided basic security. As a result, vengeful Taliban forces are staging raids in the south while militias of ethnic Tajik and Uzbek commanders in the north attack each other.

Washington has both an ethical responsibility and a deep geopolitical interest in helping Afghans build a flourishing, stable nation. This will mean extending security beyond Kabul and pushing countries that pledged billions of dollars to deliver the funds on time for major job-creating construction projects run by President Hamid Karzai's central government. And it will mean helping Karzai unseat corrupt and violent provincial warlords. If Afghanistan once again becomes a failed state, it will be America's failure.
(link)

Remember Afghanistan? The Afghan people are still waiting to be made better off than they were under the Taliban. When the people of Iraq look at this example, they can't feel very optimistic about their own future.

Complete text of the article, Negligence in Afghanistan, by the Editors of the Boston Globe

The Bush administration's failure to help Afghans rehabilitate their war-blasted land makes the United States appear either incompetent at the work of nation-building abroad or deceitful about its interest in the welfare of peoples Washington has claimed to liberate.

Twice in the past 23 years, US governments have intervened in Afghanistan. After the Soviet invasion of December 1979, the CIA cooperated with Pakistan's military intelligence and Saudi financial backers to support Afghan and foreign mujahideen waging guerrilla war against the Red Army. Soon after the Soviets left in 1989, however, US concern for Afghanistan - and for Pakistan - lapsed.

What ensued was horrific internecine warfare. Warlords and their militias made life unlivable for Afghan civilians. So intolerable did existence become under the reign of the warlords that when the Taliban seized power in 1996 - using Osama bin Laden's millions to buy off the warlords between Kandahar and Kabul - those fanatics were initially welcomed as enforcers of order and protectors of security.

This history is crucial insofar as it illuminates the scope of American responsibility for the successive calamities suffered by Afghans.

During the worst of the Taliban depredations, US officials were describing that regime as a stabilizing force and US energy companies were seeking to reach agreements with the Taliban for a pipeline that would carry natural gas from Turkmenistan through Afghanistan to Pakistan. It was only in response to Sept. 11, 2001, and with the aim of depriving bin Laden's terrorist gang of its base of operations in Afghanistan that the Bush administration invaded and, coincidentally, freed Afghans from the tyranny of the Taliban.

Today, partly as a consequence of the administration's doctrinal enmity toward foreign policy as social welfare, warlords are in the saddle again in many Afghan provinces. Poppy production and the heroin trade are flourishing. Roads and irrigation works are yet to be rebuilt. Worst of all, neither the American soldiers hunting Al Qaeda nor the International Security Assistance Force in the country have provided basic security. As a result, vengeful Taliban forces are staging raids in the south while militias of ethnic Tajik and Uzbek commanders in the north attack each other.

Washington has both an ethical responsibility and a deep geopolitical interest in helping Afghans build a flourishing, stable nation. This will mean extending security beyond Kabul and pushing countries that pledged billions of dollars to deliver the funds on time for major job-creating construction projects run by President Hamid Karzai's central government. And it will mean helping Karzai unseat corrupt and violent provincial warlords. If Afghanistan once again becomes a failed state, it will be America's failure.

reference=http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0710-06.htm
~ Posted by Al-Muhajabah, a fair and balanced niqabi, at 02:48 PM

Comments

No comments yet.

All comments are copyright their authors

RSS feed of comments on this entry

Finished reading and posting comments? Return to The Clipboard

Trackbacks

What is trackback?
You Pinged Me

Here's who's pinging me:

RSS feed of trackbacks to this entry

Note: The links in the "You pinged me" section are generated automatically as a way of showing who is linking to me. Display of these links does not constitute endorsement of the content of those sites.


Further reading

Recent entries

The following is a list of the ten most recent entries in The Clipboard as of Mar 02, 2006:

View a list of all entries in The Clipboard

Related entries

This entry has been tagged as covering the following subjects: afghanistan. The following is a list of the ten most recent entries in Al-Muhajabah's Islamic Blogs that share any of these tags:

A semantic analysis of this entry also suggests the following keywords to search for related content on: security, afghanistan, Afghanistan, flourishing, Afghan, again, afghan, warlords, mean, taliban, Karzai, people, helping, Taliban, karzai

What links here: View a list of other entries in this blog (if any) that link to this entry

To learn more about Afghanistan, visit my Afghanistan Page.

Or look generally for informational pages on my website tagged with afghanistan

Results of Semantic Search

A semantic search of Al-Muhajabah's Islamic Blogs suggests the following as the ten entries most closely related to this entry:



Elsewhere

External resources

Check out other web pages (if any) that I've bookmarked via del.icio.us that share the same tags: afghanistan

Explore reference materials from Answers.com about these subjects: afghanistan

Read news stories at Common Times about these subjects: afghanistan

View search results at gada.be metasearch service for these subjects: afghanistan

Find books at Amazon.com on these subjects: afghanistan

Other views

Want to see what other bloggers have to say about the article I cited above? Check these resources to see lists of blogs (if any) with entries that are about this article or have linked to it.

Check Waypath for blog entries generally related to this entry, or Technorati or Bloglines for blog entries that link to this entry.

Technorati tags: View blog entries, bookmarks and photos tagged by others with the same subjects as this entry:



Search options

     

For external resources on the topic of this entry, you can run a search for its title negligence in afghanistan (Google, DayPop, Feedster) or keyword(s) afghanistan (Google, DayPop, Feedster). Or search for pages related to the cited article. DayPop is a search engine similar to Google that focuses on searching news sources and blogs. Feedster searches blogs via RSS feeds.