The Clipboard The Clipboard: Echoes Of Juneteenth Haunt Us Today

Al-Muhajabah's Islamic Blogs Home
« Iraq: Integrity and Ethics in Formulating and Interpreting Intelligence | The Clipboard archives | Who'll defend the detainees? »
Comments (1, last by Ken Hagler) | Trackbacks (1 in, 0 out) | 

Email this link | Print this article | RDF

Further Reading | Elsewhere | Search Options
Add this entry to your hotlist (View your hotlist)

Echoes Of Juneteenth Haunt Us Today

Date: June 19, 2003 | 18 Rabi al-Akhir 1424 Hijriah
Subjects: democracy, voting, blacks

From an article1:

That's what makes Juneteenth such a bittersweet holiday. On the one hand, it honors a great advance for African Americans -- gaining the rights of citizenship, especially the right to vote. But it also marks the beginning of an era in which whites imposed countless discriminatory laws, such as poll taxes, literacy tests and grandfather clauses, meant to keep blacks powerless.
Many of these overtly discriminatory state laws have been called out as racist and unconstitutional, and have been wiped from the books. But there is at least one notable exception: felony disenfranchisement laws.

Felony disenfranchisement laws are state-level rules that strip voting rights from citizens who have been convicted of certain crimes. If you commit a crime, these laws say, you lose the right to vote. There are no federal guidelines about them, so their harshness varies from state to state. The most extreme states -- such as Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Kentucky and Virginia -- bar ex-felons from voting for life.
(link)

Juneteenth is June 19, 1865 when the last slaves in the U.S. were finally freed. As to felony disenfranchisement laws, I believe that once a person has served their time, they should have full citizenship rights restored. To bar a person from voting for the rest of their life because they screwed up once is unjust in the extreme. What harm is it possibly going to do to allow ex-felons to vote?

Complete text of the article, Echoes Of Juneteenth Haunt Us Today, by Joseph Hayden

Today, many African Americans celebrate Juneteenth, the bittersweet anniversary of June 19, 1865, when the last remaining slaves were freed.

Some people assume that slavery in America died with President Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation in 1863. But Lincoln lacked the power to enforce his edict in the Confederate-controlled South, and slaveholders in remote states such as Texas continued to exploit their human chattel. For two and a half years, no one told the slaves that they were no longer a white man's property. Only when a regiment of Union soldiers arrived in Texas with news of slavery's demise -- and the power to back it up -- did Lincoln's promise to African Americans come true.

While this 138-year-old tale might at first seem like ancient history, echoes of Juneteenth resonate in the struggles people of color face today. Getting rights on paper, Juneteenth reminds us, is a far cry from getting them in practice.

That's what makes Juneteenth such a bittersweet holiday. On the one hand, it honors a great advance for African Americans -- gaining the rights of citizenship, especially the right to vote. But it also marks the beginning of an era in which whites imposed countless discriminatory laws, such as poll taxes, literacy tests and grandfather clauses, meant to keep blacks powerless.

Many of these overtly discriminatory state laws have been called out as racist and unconstitutional, and have been wiped from the books. But there is at least one notable exception: felony disenfranchisement laws.

Felony disenfranchisement laws are state-level rules that strip voting rights from citizens who have been convicted of certain crimes. If you commit a crime, these laws say, you lose the right to vote. There are no federal guidelines about them, so their harshness varies from state to state. The most extreme states -- such as Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Kentucky and Virginia -- bar ex-felons from voting for life.

Is it coincidence that the harshest disenfranchisement laws are mostly in former slave states? Not in the slightest. Like poll taxes and literacy tests, the ostensibly race-neutral disenfranchisement laws were created to keep blacks from voting. In 1896, for example, Mississippi lawmakers ruled that only a narrow range of offenses -- bribery, burglary, theft, arson, perjury, forgery, embezzlement, bigamy and "obtaining money or goods under false pretenses" -- made you lose the vote. Why not murder or rape? Because ex- slaves were far more likely to commit petty property crimes than serious offenses.

Southern lawmakers were not shy about their intentions. One delegate to the Virginia convention of 1906, which established rules similar to Mississippi's, went on record at the time as saying: "This plan will eliminate the darkey as a political factor in this state in less than five years."

The laws worked. One Alabama historian found that by 1903, the laws had excluded nearly 10 times as many blacks as whites from voting.

Sound familiar? Today, our "tough on crime" policies -- especially our draconian drug laws -- disproportionately target people of color. Only 14 percent of illegal drug users are black, but blacks make up 74 percent of those sentenced for drug possession. One in three black men will be jailed at some point.

This translates directly into loss of political power. Blacks are denied the vote because of criminal records five times more often than whites. Thirteen percent of African American men are permanently disenfranchised, and many more have temporarily lost their voting rights. Latinos are also disproportionately affected, given that 16 percent of Latino men will enter prison in their lifetime. This leaves communities of color vastly underrepresented in the political process.

Many states do restore voting rights to ex-felons after they leave prison. But once you make it out, it's Juneteenth all over again. You may have technically regained the right to vote, but no one tells you. This lack of notification puts thousands of Americans in the same position as the slaves of Texas -- on paper they have rights, but if no one tells them they can exercise those rights, they remain second-class citizens.

Fortunately, there are straightforward ways to fix these problems. Contrary to popular belief, felony disenfranchisement laws are not part of the criminal justice system. They are simply state election laws, and like any other state laws, they can be amended -- or abolished. That's happening in some states. Connecticut just upgraded its laws to allow 36,000 people on probation to vote.

In New Mexico -- where ex-felons used to be disenfranchised for life -- former Republican Gov. Gary Johnson signed a law in 2001 to automatically restore the vote to qualified ex-felons.

Still, on this Juneteenth, 4.65 millions Americans can't vote because of laws that have explicitly racist history. It's time that felony disenfranchisement laws go the way of poll taxes and literacy tests, so that next Juneteenth we can celebrate another victory on the road to democracy, racial equality and true emancipation.

reference=http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0619-06.htm
~ Posted by Al-Muhajabah, a fair and balanced niqabi, at 07:39 PM

Comments

Ken Hagler said: Total comments: 43   gold stargold stargold stargold star

Subject: Re: Echoes Of Juneteenth Haunt Us Today

The nature of the American legal system and what consitutes a felony have changed quite a bit since those laws were passed. Losing your right to vote might be reasonable for an arsonist, but nowdays you can get a felony conviction for having plants in your car, for making a mistake while filling out a complicated BATF form, or even for doing nothing at all but being unable to afford a lawyer after the government seizes your life savings.

However, some of the arguements the author of the article makes are so silly that they actually harm his position. For example, take this: In 1896, for example, Mississippi lawmakers ruled that only a narrow range of offenses -- bribery, burglary, theft, arson, perjury, forgery, embezzlement, bigamy and "obtaining money or goods under false pretenses" -- made you lose the vote. Why not murder or rape? Because ex- slaves were far more likely to commit petty property crimes than serious offenses. Hardly. In 1896 murder or rape got you a life sentence if you were lucky, and more likely an execution. That law isn't directed at ex-slaves, it's directed at offenses minor enough that the person convicted would actually have been set free again someday.



~ Posted at June 20, 2003 09:59 AM | Comment Permalink

All comments are copyright their authors

RSS feed of comments on this entry

Finished reading and posting comments? Return to The Clipboard

Trackbacks

What is trackback?
You Pinged Me

Here's who's pinging me:

RSS feed of trackbacks to this entry

Note: The links in the "You pinged me" section are generated automatically as a way of showing who is linking to me. Display of these links does not constitute endorsement of the content of those sites.


Further reading

Recent entries

The following is a list of the ten most recent entries in The Clipboard as of Mar 02, 2006:

View a list of all entries in The Clipboard

Related entries

This entry has been tagged as covering the following subjects: democracy voting blacks. The following is a list of the ten most recent entries in Al-Muhajabah's Islamic Blogs that share any of these tags:

A semantic analysis of this entry also suggests the following keywords to search for related content on: felony disenfranchisement, disenfranchisement laws, right vote, murder rape, laws, felony, vote, life, state, been, voting, Juneteenth, right, offenses, person, rights, juneteenth, disenfranchisement, slaves, citizenship, bar, makes, commit, Mississippi, crimes

What links here: View a list of other entries in this blog (if any) that link to this entry

Or look generally for informational pages on my website tagged with democracy, voting, blacks

Results of Semantic Search

A semantic search of Al-Muhajabah's Islamic Blogs suggests the following as the ten entries most closely related to this entry:



Elsewhere

External resources

Check out other web pages (if any) that I've bookmarked via del.icio.us that share the same tags: democracy, voting, blacks

Explore reference materials from Answers.com about these subjects: democracy, voting, blacks

Read news stories at Common Times about these subjects: democracy, voting, blacks

View search results at gada.be metasearch service for these subjects: democracy, voting, blacks

Find books at Amazon.com on these subjects: democracy, voting, blacks

Other views

Want to see what other bloggers have to say about the article I cited above? Check these resources to see lists of blogs (if any) with entries that are about this article or have linked to it.

Check Waypath for blog entries generally related to this entry, or Technorati or Bloglines for blog entries that link to this entry.

Technorati tags: View blog entries, bookmarks and photos tagged by others with the same subjects as this entry:



Search options

     

For external resources on the topic of this entry, you can run a search for its title echoes of juneteenth haunt us today (Google, DayPop, Feedster) or keyword(s) democracy voting blacks (Google, DayPop, Feedster). Or search for pages related to the cited article. DayPop is a search engine similar to Google that focuses on searching news sources and blogs. Feedster searches blogs via RSS feeds.